The Suspended State
The air in the elevator was stagnant, tasting of ozone and 15 years of accumulated dust. I was suspended between the 5th and 15th floors, the emergency lights flickering exactly 25 times before settling into a dull, sickly yellow hum. It is a peculiar thing, being trapped in a 4×4 box. You realize very quickly that your internal compass is useless when you aren’t moving. You feel the gravity, but you have no trajectory. This, I realized as the minutes ticked past 25, is exactly what it feels like to sit through a corporate strategy pivot. It is the sensation of being stuck, while the people in charge press every button on the panel, hoping one of them isn’t just an alarm but an actual exit.
Yesterday, the memo arrived. It was 55 pages of high-gloss PDF that smelled, even digitally, of desperation. The headline didn’t say ‘We failed.’ It said ‘A New Strategic Horizon.’ This is the linguistic gymnastics of the modern era.
We don’t fail anymore; we just relaunch. We don’t admit that our initial product was a solution in search of a problem; we ‘realign our core competencies with emerging market shifts.’ It’s a pivot. But when you look closely at the 15 key pillars of this new direction, they are identical to the old pillars, just painted a slightly different shade of blue.
The Driving Instructor’s Lesson
“You’re just wearing out the rubber, kid. Moving the wheel doesn’t mean you’re going anywhere. Sometimes you have to admit you drove into a dead end and just walk home.”
“
That’s the core frustration of the pivot. It’s the refusal to walk home. Leadership would rather spend $575 an hour on consultants to rename ‘customer support’ to ‘client success’ than admit the product is fundamentally broken. They want the ‘action’ of change without the ‘work’ of change. If they change the terminology, they can pretend the previous 155 days of stagnation were just a ‘learning phase.’
The Nomenclature Swap
The Old Term
The New Label
I’ve been guilty of this myself. I once spent 45 minutes rewriting a project proposal because I knew the client hated the word ‘optimization.’ I didn’t change the process. I didn’t change the timeline. I didn’t even change the price. I just replaced every instance of ‘optimize’ with ‘streamline.’ It was a pivot. It was also a lie.
Polishing Brass on a Sinking Ship
Being stuck in that elevator for 25 minutes gave me too much time to think about these things. You start to notice the details when the world stops moving. I noticed the 5 scratches on the brass railing. I noticed the way my heart rate spiked every time the cable groaned. In a pivot, we ignore the groaning cables. We focus on the new fonts. We focus on the ‘launch party’ scheduled for the 25th of the month.
Relaunch Fatigue Level (Accumulated Cynicism)
80%
When the CEO stands up and announces that we are ‘pivoting to a platform-first strategy’-which is exactly what we said we were doing back in 2025-you can see the light go out in people’s eyes. It’s the sound of 155 keyboards typing simultaneously, not to update code, but to update resumes. Because everyone knows. Everyone sees the three-point turn in the narrow alley.
STOP
The Loop: 5 Stages of Consistent Failure
1. Denial
Of the current failure.
2. Validation
Hiring external validators (consultants).
3. Naming Ceremony
The slide deck rollout.
5. Re-realization (105 Days)
Nothing has actually changed. It’s a loop.
The New is just the Old with a different haircut.
Seeking Clarity in the Noise
I find myself looking for voices that cut through this noise, places like ems89 where the reality of technical execution and strategic clarity isn’t buried under layers of rebranding. We need more of that. We need more people who are willing to say that the elevator is stuck, rather than announcing a ‘Vertical Transition Optimization Initiative.’
For clear execution principles, see the work linked at ems89.co.
The Act of Reversing
Sofia W.J. eventually made me get out of the car that day in the alley. She sat in the driver’s seat, looked at the 5-inch gap between the bumper and the brick wall, and did the one thing I was too proud to do: she reversed all the way out, back into the main street, and started over from a different block. She didn’t call it a pivot. She called it ‘fixing a mistake.’ There is a dignity in that which the modern corporate structure has completely eroded. We have replaced the ‘fix’ with the ‘rebrand.’
Walking Out the Front Door
I’ve spent 45 percent of my career watching these cycles. [The 5 stages of a corporate pivot are remarkably consistent]… It’s a loop. It’s the elevator moving up and down between the same 5 floors, but the buttons have been replaced with touchscreens that don’t work when your hands are sweaty.
I just admitted I was in the wrong building.
Vulnerability replaces the rebrand.
We need more leaders who can look at a 55-page relaunch plan and say, ‘This is just a three-point turn in a dead end.’ But that would require a level of vulnerability that isn’t taught in MBA programs. It’s easier to just hire another consultant and schedule another 45-minute ‘All Hands’ meeting to explain why the ‘New Direction’ is totally different from the old one…
The pivot is a lie we tell ourselves so we don’t have to sleep with the lights on. It’s a relaunch of a dream that died 155 weeks ago. And until we stop valuing the appearance of action over the substance of truth, we’re all just going to keep getting stuck in the same elevator, watching the lights flicker, waiting for someone to press a button that actually leads to the street.