I really like these when they actually fix something of mine, however that’s rare for essentially the most half. The principle drawback I have with them is that they mess up GRUB, and they mess up my NVIDIA drivers. GRUB messes up because Ubuntu simply sets everything to the default menu, which is Ubuntu, secure mode, and memtest. I by no means use safe mode or memes, so I normally get rid of those.
I even have an XP partition which I would like to see in the GRUB menu, but it surely would not like to put that in either. This stuff isn’t an enormous deal, it’s only a matter of fixing the configuration file. Unfortunately, from a much less-technical perspective, a user has simply lost access to their Windows drive and has no thought how to repair it.
Not a very good thing! I showed my girlfriend the best way to manually edit her grub/menu.Lst file to place Windows again, however unfortunately sometimes she forgets tips on how to do it correctly and fudges the entire thing. There goes the entire PC! Ubuntu: Fix THIS. You may hate Windows, but that doesn’t mean the people who use your system hate it too. Now, the big half that pissed me off probably the most. I received a model spanking new GeForce 8800 in December which runs beautifully. Unfortunately, the open-supply NVIDIA drivers don’t work very effectively for it. I can run at 640×480. Now, I’m not likely a wizard with X, so in the case of contact the xorg.conf file, I’m somewhat scared.
I do not wish to make things worse, which is usually what occurs when a contact Linux’s non-public parts (something not in my house folder). So what I do is just to obtain the great little installer from NVIDIA’s website and get that going, which for probably the most half fixes the issue. F1 and shut down X isn’t one thing the average user would like – or know how – to do. Anyway, I simply wish that the kernel update would additionally keep my NVIDIA drivers intact. EDIT: Apparently it wasn’t just the video card drivers that the replace messed up, appears like my printer is useless too. Fortunately I have an XP set up that WORKS.
Prisma named this request “deeply nested” however, it’s not unusual for a frontend-going through GraphQL API to have to handle a query much like this. Last year we had to exclude this question as we didn’t get any results from Prisma and weren’t sure why. This 12 months we figured it out: Prisma had turned into overwhelmed during the warmup period and could not respond when the main benchmarks began.
The solution was to cut back the concurrency in the course of the 5-minute warmup interval from 100rps to 10rps (you may examine why warm up is necessary in final year publish). This query shows fetching all the rows from a specific assortment in the database, and a number of the associated data. Typically a frontend GraphQL request like this should have pagination at the root degree (e.g. limiting to 50 albums at a time), however since there’s only 347 rows in the album’s desk it’s not too dangerous. This query better represents a GraphQL query you would possibly make out of your backend reasonably than one out of your web frontend.
- Keep your design goal-pushed
- Are you able to create unique content material about your corporation/industry
- Self-driving cars, taxis and buses will turn into a actuality in the next few years
- Fixed stay videos
This question is almost an identical to the previous one, besides it reduces the variety of results (from 347 down to only 3) by filtering towards a specific artist. It is a moderately good instance of a simple frontend GraphQL question. This question is very simple and gentle, simply requesting two fields from a single row within the database.
It’s rare that you’d have a GraphQL request this simple in the web frontend of a non-trivial application—it reveals extra about the underlying performance of the HTTP layer than the GraphQL resolution itself. Included for completeness, this query requests 2 columns from 20 rows in a single database table—like a barely heavier version of byArtistId.
GraphQL requests from webpages are rarely this simple. Is speed really that important? Yes, and no. I do optimization because it’s a fun problem to see how far I can push the computer in an interpreted language without having to make my code too messy. PostGraphile’s users will now profit from quicker performance and happier end users simply from updating to the newest version — they don’t need to change any of their code in any respect. But performance isn’t everything—one of the issues we give attention to at PostGraphile is extensibility.